Is due process of law violated by refusal to hear administrative appeal due to omission in information block?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is due process of law guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States violated by the Board’s refusal to hear petitioner’s administrative appeal pursuant to Worker’s Compensation Law Section 23 owing to an omission from an information block 3/64th of an inch high, so small the brain cannot process it when an alternate source of the same information is listed? 2. Does burdening the right to counsel in civil cases guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution to the point that the Board can refuse to entertain a less than perfectly filled out Application for Board Review (form RB 89) notwithstanding lack of prejudice to opposing parties? 3. Is equal protection of the law guaranteed by the 14th Amendment by burdening the exercise of the right to counsel with a requirement that Application for Board Review (RB 89) be completed perfectly?