Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al.
DueProcess
Can court judgement be entirely untrue, refer to a previous vague judgement in dispute from an ex parte dependency case in violation of due process?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can court judgement be entirely untrue, refer to a previous vague judgement in dispute from an ex parte dependency case in violation of due process? 2. Is a minor able to file a lawsuit to claim compensation, declarative relief for violations of constitutional rights, violation of liberty, upon adult age when minor never had the opportunity at an earlier time? 3. Does parent have constitutional right to | compensation for vidlations of due , process, interference in parental rights, interference in legal custody, by seizing child under color of law, without cause, directed by a phone call from the state during a contractual ordered discharge from private facility in breach of contract requiring child to go home with parents? PARTIES TO PROCEEDING UHS OF PHOENIX, LLC, dba QUAIL RUN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, an Arizona Corporation, and LA FRONTERA EMPACT-SPC, an Organization, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, and ARIZONA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, ABC CORPORATION I-X; AND BLACK AND WHITE PARTNERSHIPS, AND/OR SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPS I-X, et al | RELATED CASES Rynn V DCS Arizona Supreme court case No. CV230156-PR Rynn V Daniel Washburn Arizona Supreme court case No. CV23-0157-PR In Dependency of MR. Division Two case No. 2 CA-JV 2023-0098 DCS v Rynn Pinal County Superior Court Case No. $1100JD201700116 Rynn v Mckay case No. 2:18-cv-00414-JJT Ninth Circuit No. 21-16454 U.S. Supreme court No. 22A1024 4