No. 23-157

Samuel O. Jacobs v. Kent Jacobs, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 11th-amendment 14th-amendment 5th-amendment 8th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process eleventh-amendment federal-procedure rooker-feldman-doctrine sovereign-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a State Court use the 11th Amendment, Soverign Immunity, and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine to justify or allow it to violate the 14th, 8th, 5th, and 4th Amendments of the Constitution, Federal Rules, and Federal Laws?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1. Can a State Court use the 11th Amendment, Soverign Immunity, and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine to justify or allow it to violate the 14th, 8th, 5th, and | 4th Amendments of the Constitution, Federal Rules, and Federal Laws? } 2. Can the a State Court deny my right to plead and | : conduct my own case which is guaranteed under | 28USC1654? | 8. Is a 9 year sentence for writing a letter to my son justified? 4. Can my right to trial which is guaranteed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 38 and the Seventh Amendment be denied? 5. Are my Miranda rights being violated because the State Court is ignoring a Motion to Explain why I was to be arrested? i .

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent Dutchess County Family Court to respond filed.
2023-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)

Attorneys

Dutchess County Family Court
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent
Samuel Jacobs
Samuel O. Jacobs — Petitioner