No. 23-174
Richard Rynn v. First Transit, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights dismissal due-process employer-liability false-accusations legal-standing procedural-hearing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can case be dismissed without a hearing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can case be dismissed without a hearing? 2. Is employer liable for violations of due process, constitutional rights violations in year 2019, from false accusations learned in year 2021 that continues on record? 3 PARTIES TO PROCEEDING Defendant First Transit RELATED CASES Rynn V Mckay District Case No. 2:18-cv-00414 JJT pending U.S. Supreme court No. 22A1024 pending Mathews V Rynn Avondale city court case No. P02019000235, pending, Rynn V First Transit U.S. Supreme Court No. 2241001 pending AZ Superior Court of Maricopa County Case no. CV2022-011208 pending
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent First Transit, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2023)
2023-05-17
Application (22A1000) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 22, 2023.
2023-05-12
Application (22A1000) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 23, 2023 to July 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
First Transit, Inc.
Kimberly M. Shappley — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent
Kimberly M. Shappley — Littler Mendelson, P.C., Respondent