Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in determining subject-matter-jurisdiction

QUESTION PRESENTED The main issue before the Court pertains to the determination of subject matter jurisdiction by the Seventh Circuit of the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The Plaintiff needs to be informed that a necessary hearing, as per Turner v. Rogers, 564 U.S. 431 (2011), was not conducted. The Appellate has raised concerns regarding subject matter jurisdiction in various state court proceedings due to the absence of the required Turner hearing. This raises questions about the potential violation of the Appellant's due process rights and whether it constitutes a valid legal basis for court intervention? The Accardi Doctrine Requires government officials to follow agency regulations which has become an important rule of law even when it’s not convenient. Unpublished agency guidelines are not considered binding rules under this doctrine, but guidelines that establish procedural and substantive restraints to protect individuals from arbitrary treatment by government officials should be covered. It's important to have a consistent application of these rules, especially in cases where individual rights are affected. See United States ex rel. Accardi vs. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954). 3 0)