No. 23-2
Gerald Spruell v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review conspiracy criminal-procedure drug-conspiracy drug-quantities evidence evidence-sufficiency jury-verdict mandatory-minimum sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and drug quantities attributed to the conspiracy charge
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and drug quantities attributed to the conspiracy charge. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the district court’s erroneous mandatory minimum and Guidelines application was harmless. ii PARTIES Gerald Spruell is the Petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the Respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee below. STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
Attorneys
Gerald Spruell
Jeremy Brian Gordon — Law Office of Jeremy Gordon, Petitioner
Jeremy Brian Gordon — Law Office of Jeremy Gordon, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent