No. 23-211
Joseph G. Wortley v. James Juranitch, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: bad-faith bad-faith-filing bankruptcy bankruptcy-petition business-divorce closely-held-business closely-held-company deadlock insider-filing involuntary-bankruptcy involuntary-petition
Key Terms:
Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an insider's involuntary bankruptcy petition against his closely-held business for the express purpose of 'breaking a deadlock' or to get a 'business divorce' from another faction of insiders is a bad faith filing under the United States Bankruptcy Code?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether an insider’s involuntary bankruptcy petition against his closely-held business for the express purpose of “breaking a deadlock” or to get a “business divorce” from another faction of insiders is a bad faith filing under the United States Bankruptcy Code?
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-26
Waiver of right of respondents Chad P. Pugatch and Rice Pugatch Robinson & Schiller, P. A. to respond filed.
2023-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent James Juranitch to respond filed.
2023-09-25
Waiver of right of respondents Chrispus Venture Capital, LLC and Richard Tarrant to respond filed.
2023-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 6, 2023)
Attorneys
Chad P. Pugatch and Rice Pugatch Robinson & Schiller, P. A.
Chad P. Pugatch — Lorium Law Uncommon Perspective, Respondent
Chad P. Pugatch — Lorium Law Uncommon Perspective, Respondent
Chrispus Venture Capital, LLC and Richard Tarrant
Kristen M. Fiore — Akerman LLP, Respondent
Kristen M. Fiore — Akerman LLP, Respondent
Joseph G. Wortley
Robert Jeffrey Hauser — Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Petitioner
Robert Jeffrey Hauser — Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Petitioner