No. 23-222
Dawn M. White, et vir v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights close-relationship court-criteria due-process hindrance legal-capacity legal-standing pro-se pro-se-representation procedural-rights spousal-representation standing
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-11-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a husband represent the interests of his wife in a pro-se capacity if they meet the criteria previously established by this Court for a close relationship and a hindrance to the wife's ability to represent herself?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can a husband represent the interests of his wife ina pro-se capacity if they meet the criteria previously established by this Court for a close relationship and a hinderance to the wife’s ability to represent herself?
Docket Entries
2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent