No. 23-223
Charles J. Jenkins v. TriWest Healthcare Alliance, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights court-procedure due-process federal-circuit federal-courts judicial-authority judicial-review rule-56 separation-of-powers stare-decisis sua-sponte
Key Terms:
Patent
Patent
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-triumvirate-overstepped-their-authority
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the triumvirate overstepped their authority when they decided (sua sponte) to invoke, incite, insurrect, or for the lack of a better description “A Coup, or a Coup’ etat” which appears as a overthrow of the lower court’s regime by essentially usurping their authority and violating the Doctrine of Stare Decisis? 2. Whether the lower court’s Rule 56 decision can be ‘Invalidated by the (Federal Circuit(s)) as akin to the Wakefield petition and Virentem case whereby those claims were invalidated and in its stead replaced them with a negative decisions or stamp the single word (“AFFIRM”)? ii .
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Brief of respondent TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp. in opposition filed.
2023-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)
Attorneys
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.
Jason Robert Scheiderer — Dentons US LLP, Respondent
Jason Robert Scheiderer — Dentons US LLP, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent