Does the Rule of Law under Title 49 U.S. Code 5124 apply to the Respondent?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Introduction: With Great Respect this Case is about Life, Liberty and the Pursuit for Righteousness at 30,000 feet. Federal Law Fact: Federal Rule of Law, Title 49 U.S. Code 5124, Forbids Hazard Materials onboard the Aircraft. National/Global Significant Fact: The Respondent willfully Approves the Use of “Chemical ; Substance Products” inside the Aircraft Cabin for Cleaning, Sanitizing, Disinfecting and Air-Freshening, with No Oversight providing Verification and Certification with an Official Government Document “Certificate of Compliance” from the Legislative Branch, that the Respondent Js or Is Not, In Fact Following the Rule of Law. 10 Respectful Federal and State Questions 1. With Respect, does the Rule of Law under Title 49 U.S. Code 5124, Apply to the Respondent? 2. With Respect, is the Respondent in Compliance with the Statutes, referring to Title 49 US. Code 5124? ' 3. With Respect, may the Petitioners Writ of Certiorari have Merit to be Granted when the Substantial Federal Questions above to this Case, have Never been answered by the Lower Courts? 4. With Respect, may the Petitioners Writ of Certiorari have Merit to be Granted when the Supreme Court of Ohio (SCO) Declines to Accept Jurisdiction of the Appeal, Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 7.08(B)(4)? (App.1la) 5. With Respect, do you believe products used to Clean, Sanitize, Disinfect and Air-Freshen the Aircraft Cabin should be Transparent, No Secrets, with complete List of Ingredients made available, for a better Air-Quality Environment? 6. With Respect, may the Petitioners Writ of Certiorari have Merit to be Granted when there are Chemical Exposures from Cleaning, Sanitizing, Disinfecting and Air-Freshening Products used inside the Aircraft Cabin, willfully Approved by the Respondent, some with labels that have a “PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENT: HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND . DOMESTIC ANIMALS.”? 7. With Respect, may our United States of America 118th Congress, please Inspect and Provide the Respondent and Air-Travelers with an Official Government Oversight Document: “Certificate of Compliance”, Including a Complete “Aircraft Cabin . Product List with 100% of the Ingredients”, Required for “Safety and Healthcare in the Aircraft Cabin”? 8. With Respect may the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Case No. 19-395, Respectfully Submitted on September 19, 2019, Before a Global Pandemic, have Merit for Respectfully Granting the Petitioner’s Second Writ of Certiorari, for a Judicial Review of the Facts and Law, when the Petitioners Work Environment is Global? 9. With Respect, may this Second Petition for Writ of Certiorari, have Merit to be Granted when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Denied, first Case No. 19-395, Petition for Rehearing on January 21, 2020, the same approximate if not the day, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced and Confirmed the First Case of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States of America? 10. With Respect, may the Continuance of this Case which Holds NATIONAL/GLOBAL SIGNIFICANCE, have Merit for Granting the Petitioners Second Writ of Certiorari? iv LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Supreme Court of Ohio Case No. 2023-0072 CHRISTINA ALESSIO, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC, ET AL., Date of Order Entry: April 11, 2023 Court of Appeals, Ohio Eighth Appellate District County of Cuyahoga Case No. 111449 CHRISTINA ALESSIO, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC, ET AL., Date of Opinion and Journal Entry: December 15, 2022 , Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Case No. CV-21-949578 CHRISTINA ALESSIO, v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC ET AL., Date of Journal Entry: March 31, 2022 | Vv