No. 23-247
S. C., Mother v. Philadelphia Department of Human Services, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process factual-findings judicial-review legal-error misapplication-of-law state-court-opinion
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Pennsylvania Courts' decisions constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplications of law, and deny Petitioner due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Did the Opinions of the Pennsylvania Courts constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplications of properly stated rules of law, as well as failing to provide Petitioner with Due Process as required by the Constitution of the United States? i LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania Department of Human Services to respond filed.
2023-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Pennsylvania Department of Human Services
Jane Lovitch Istvan — City of Philadelphia Law Department, Respondent
Jane Lovitch Istvan — City of Philadelphia Law Department, Respondent
S. C.
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner