Whether the judge-made "clearly established law" qualified immunity standard, which lacks textual, historical, and logical support, and which does not advance its purported policy objectives, should be abolished or limited?

Whether respondents are entitled to qualified immunity on Felkner's First Amendment claims when they had ample time to reflect and seek legal counsel prior to engaging in a sustained course of conduct that abridged Petitioner's clearly established First Amendment right to freedom of speech?

Whether the judge-made 'clearly established law' qualified immunity standard should be abolished or limited