No. 23-285
Amory Investments LLC, et al. v. Tyson Foods Incorporated, et al.
Tags: antitrust-law appellate-review collateral-order-doctrine district-court federal-antitrust-law judicial-procedure private-enforcement public-interest standing
Key Terms:
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a district court order permitting significant interference with private enforcement of federal antitrust law implicate an interest sufficiently important to warrant immediate appellate review under the collateral order doctrine?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does a district court order permitting significant interference with private enforcement of federal antitrust law implicate an interest sufficiently important to warrant immediate appellate review under the collateral order doctrine?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-04
Reply of petitioners Amory Investments LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-22
Brief of respondents Tyson Foods Incorporated, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 22, 2023, for all respondents.
2023-10-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 23, 2023 to November 22, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Amory Investments LLC, et al.
Scott E. Gant — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Petitioner
Scott E. Gant — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Petitioner
Perdue Farms, Inc.; Perdue Foods LLC
Danielle Rose Foley — Venable LLP, Respondent
Danielle Rose Foley — Venable LLP, Respondent