No. 23-308

Paul Steelman, Individually and as Trustee of the Steelman Asset Protection Trust, et al. v. Ernest Bock LLC

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure colorado-river colorado-river-doctrine federal-abstention federal-proceedings judicial-proceedings parallel-state-proceedings procedural-stay state-court-litigation stay water-rights
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a stay of federal proceedings under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States is permissible

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a stay of federal proceedings under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976), is permissible only when a pending state court case will necessarily resolve the federal proceedings however it is decided (as the Ninth Circuit held below), or whether a stay is permissible when one of the potential outcomes in state court can completely resolve the case, even if a second potential outcome would leave further issues for federal litigation (as the Seventh Circuit has held).

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-13
Reply of petitioners Paul Steelman, Individually and as Trustee of the Steelman Asset Protection Trust, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-27
2023-10-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 27, 2023. See Rule 30.1.
2023-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 26, 2023 to November 25, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-22

Attorneys

Ernest Bock LLC
John F PalladinoHankin Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, P.C., Respondent
John F PalladinoHankin Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, P.C., Respondent
Paul Steelman, Individually and as Trustee of the Steelman Asset Protection Trust, et al.
Anton MetlitskyO'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Petitioner
Anton MetlitskyO'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Petitioner