No. 23-318
Nicolas A. Salomon v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: arbitration arbitration-proceedings california-law due-process federal-arbitration-act fourteenth-amendment preemption right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Federal Arbitration Act preempt California law on the right to counsel in an arbitration proceeding?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does the Federal Arbitration Act preempt California law on the right to counsel in an arbitration proceeding? Does the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of a right to representation extend to arbitration proceedings?
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, et al. to respond filed.
2023-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 27, 2023)
2023-08-16
Application (23A85) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 23, 2023.
2023-08-11
Application (23A85) to extend further the time from August 24, 2023 to September 23, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2023-07-28
Application (23A85) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 24, 2023.
2023-07-25
Application (23A85) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2023 to August 24, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, et al.
Susan K. Leader — Paul Hasting LLP, Respondent
Susan K. Leader — Paul Hasting LLP, Respondent
Nicolas A. Salomon
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner