No. 23-321
Jerry J. Davis, Jr. v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment strickland strickland-standard trial-counsel
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court and Sixth Circuit Erred When Both Found That Mr. Davis Was Not Entitled to the Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court and Sixth Circuit Erred When Both Found That Mr. Davis Was Not Entitled to the Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under Strickland? Whether the District Court Erred When It Denied Mr. Davis Relief Because His Trial Counsel Improperly Conceded His Guilt?
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 27, 2023)
2023-07-18
Application (23A36) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 24, 2023.
2023-07-11
Application (23A36) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 10, 2023 to September 24, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Jerry J. Davis
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent