Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that 'arguable probable cause' can support a claim for qualified-immunity,summary-judgment,interlocutory-appeal,disputed-facts,jury-trial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that “arguable probable cause” can support a claim for qualified immunity on summary judgment after the District Court denied an interlocutory appeal because there were disputed issues of material fact requiring a jury trial. Whether a Court of Appeals should be required to evaluate factual findings in interlocutory appeals denying summary judgment based qualified immunity under the abuse of discretion standards, rather than a de novo standard.