No. 23-333

Evan S. Gutman v. Citibank, N.A.

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2023-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection judicial-immunity litigation-privilege tortious-act
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-11-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a State Supreme Court infringe upon the Due Process and Equal Protection Clause's Rights of a Litigant in both the Civil and Criminal Context in every single case in the State, by expressly holding in written terms that any Illegal Tortious Act committed within the context of a judicial proceeding is entitled to Absolute Immunity under the doctrine of Litigation Privilege?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Does a State Supreme Court infringe upon the Due Process and Equal Protection Clause’ ; Rights of a Litigant in both the Civil and . . Criminal Context in every single case in the State, by expressly holding in written terms . that any Illegal Tortious Act committed within : the context of a judicial proceeding is entitled to Absolute Immunity under the doctrine of : Litigation Privilege ? (ii)

Docket Entries

2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-09-19
Waiver of right of respondent CitiBank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-09-08

Attorneys

CitiBank, N.A.
Donald A. MihokovichAdams and Reese, LLP, Respondent
Evan S. Gutman
Evan S. Gutman — Petitioner