No. 23-335
Tags: 4th-amendment adequate-remedies civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process excessive-force exclusionary-rule lawful-seizure police-misconduct remedies
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the exclusionary rule apply to suppress evidence where a court has found the use of excessive force in the execution of an otherwise lawful seizure, given that other adequate remedies to deter police misconduct exist?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the exclusionary rule apply to suppress evidence where a court has found the use of excessive force in the execution of an otherwise lawful seizure, given that other adequate remedies to deter police misconduct exist? ii STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-20
Reply of petitioner Kansas filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-06
Brief of respondent Jeremy A. Cline in opposition filed.
2023-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 29, 2023.
2023-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 30, 2023 to November 29, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeremy A. Cline
Michael B. Kimberly — McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Respondent
State of Kansas
Anthony John Powell — Office of the Kansas Attomey General, Petitioner