Whether ALJs violate the rule-of-law by depriving petitioners of their disability-pensions on credibility-grounds

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether ALJs violate the rule of law by depriving petitioners of their disability pensions on credibility grounds when petitioners have met their burden of : proof and the questioning of their credibility is based on an ALJ’s unexplained “impression” and on a state expert’s opinion not based on medical facts. , 2. Whether state Appeliate and Supreme Courts respectively deny petitioners due process of the law . when: a. Affirming an ALJ’s Decision by making false statements projudicial to petitioner and by failing to address petitioner’s Brief’s legal . points showing that the ALJ’s Decision wasn’t based on cogent reasons. b. Ignoring a petitioner’s request to investigate a likely collusion between the Appellate Court and the agency in an ongoing appeal and later denying review of said court’s decision. 3. Whether state courts violate the First Amendment when sealing records on the grounds that petitioner’s privacy needs to be protected even though such privacy does not overcome the strong presumption of public access to records and even though petitioner wants the record unsealed in order to share it with the public.