No. 23-36

Liam C. Lattin v. United States

Lower Court: Armed Forces
Docketed: 2023-07-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: case-by-case case-by-case-analysis categorical deterrence evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment social-cost suppression
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Patent Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the social cost of suppression is determined on a case-by-case basis or has been resolved categorically by this Court's Fourth Amendment jurisprudence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), this Court established the framework for determining when evidence must be suppressed under the Exclusionary Rule. That framework balances the deterrent value of suppression against its social cost. This case presents the question whether the social cost of suppression is determined on a case-by-case basis or has been resolved categorically by this Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-07-14
Letter from petitioner received.
2023-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 11, 2023)
2023-06-21
Application (22A1094) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 28, 2023.
2023-06-15
Application (22A1094) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2023 to August 28, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Liam Lattin
Brenner McGrath FissellLaw Office of Brenner Fissell, Petitioner
Brenner McGrath FissellLaw Office of Brenner Fissell, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent