No. 23-379

John S. Barth v. Department of Justice, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2023-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: checks-and-balances civil-rights due-process executive-discretion grand-jury political-corruption racketeering rico sovereign-immunity
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Do federal agencies have discretion to collude in racketeering crime?

2. Do federal agencies have "sovereign immunity " in racketeering crime?

3. Shall this Court exercise fortitude to implement Checks and Balances and enforce a code of conduct in government, or must it acquiesce in politically motivated abuses of office in the Executive and Judicial Branches?

4. Does RICO provide for civil cases against agency racketeering?

5. Shall this Court make writ of mandamus to empanel a grand jury to investigate the defendant agency factions and the original defendants?

6. Shall this Court correct false statements about the Complaint and proceedings by the lower court and DOJ, intended to obstruct review?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do federal agencies have discretion to collude in racketeering crime?

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Department of Justice, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
John S. Barth
John S. Barth — Petitioner