Whether Respondent voided and denial of permanent streamline mortgage modification agreement is a violation of United States Constitution

QUESTION PRESENTED Rule 14.1(a) , 1. Whether Respondent voided and denial of permanent streamline mortgage modification agreement because Petitioner's husband won’t sign the permanent streamline mortgage modification agree; ment is a violation of United States Constitution 14th Amendment “nor deny to any person within its , jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”? 2. Whether Respondent voided and denial of permanent streamline mortgage modification agreement , ; is a violation of United States Constitution Article I Section 10 Law “Nor impairing the Obligation of Contracts”? 3. Whether consent judgment for foreclosure without Petitioner’s knowledge, consent and signature was signed by attorney representing Respondent’s law firm and attorney representing Petitioner’s law firm and State court judge is in violation of due process of clause in United States Constitution 5th Amendment “nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” and 14th Amendment, “nor shall any State deprive any per: son of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”? 4. Whether the foreclosure judgement amount and forfeiture of property worth far more than needed to satisfy a debt plus, interest, penalties, and costs, is a fine within the meaning of the U.S. Constitution 8th Amendment? il Case: Karen Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. PARTIES TO PROCEEDING AND RELATED CASES Rule 14.1(b)(i) 1. Federal National Mortgage Association — promissory note holder or lender. Approved Petitioner’s Permanent Streamline Loan modification. 2. Ho, Wing Kei — Petitioner’s husband, Defendant. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. did not know the last name for Petitioner’s husband and used Kei Ho as last name. Wing Ho is not on the deed to Karen Yeh Ho’s real estate property. 3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Responder, Appellee, Plaintiff, loan servicer) is a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States. Denied permanent streamline loan modification agreement. 4, Wells Fargo & Co. indirectly owns 100% of the stock of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Stock Ticker WFC). With the exception of Wells Fargo & Co., no publicly — traded company owns 10% or more of the stock of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. 5. WFC Holdings, LLC ; 6. Yeh Ho, Karen — (Petitioner, Appellant, Defendant, former sole title owner homeowner, the only person on the deed and on the promissory note). iii Case: Karen Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 7, The foreclosed property or taking property or stolen property. 8038 Tangelo Drive, Boynton Beach, Florida 33436. Palm Beach County. RELATED CASES Rule 14.1(b)G) e Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2211231, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11t Circuit. Judgment entered April 27, 2023. Before Honorable Circuit Judges: Newsom, Grant and Anderson. e Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1711918, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11‘ Circuit. Judgment entered June 21, 2018. Before Honora: ble Circuit Judges: Marcus, Martin, and Rosenbaum. e Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., D.C. Case No. 9:15-cv-81522-KAM, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Judgment entered April 10, 2017 and March 19, 2022 Before Honorable District Judge: Kenneth A. Marra. e Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida 4th District Court. Case no: 4D15-291. Judgment entered October 1, 2015 (No. written decision PCA) Before Honorable State District Court Judge: Warner, Gerber and Klingensmith, JJ., Concur. ny oe Case: Karen Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. e Karen C. Yeh Ho v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida 4t District Court. Case no: 4D15-4736. Judgment entered October 1, 2015 (No. written decision PCA) Before Honorable State District Court Judge: Ciklin, C.J., Taylor and Conner, JJ., Concur. e Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Karen Yeh Ho et. al., 15th Judicial Circuit In and For Palm Beach County, Florida. Case no: 50-2012-CA-002992