No. 23-386
Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al. v. Epic Systems Corporation
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: avoided-costs civil-procedure damages due-process economic-harm federal-courts legal-damages punitive-damages trade-secret trade-secrets unjust-enrichment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities TradeSecret
DueProcess Securities TradeSecret
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether avoided costs are available as unjust enrichment damages
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether avoided costs are available as unjust enrichment damages where they both do not reflect any actual benefit obtained by the defendant and there is no economic harm to the trade secret holder? 2. Whether a $140 million punitive damages award, on top of a $140 million unjust enrichment damages award, is excessive, where the plaintiff suffered no harm, the defendant did not benefit from the misappropriation, and the unjust enrichment damages award already served a deterrent function?
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent Epic Systems Corporation to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Epic Systems Corporation
Michael T. Brody — Jenner & Block LLP, Respondent
Michael T. Brody — Jenner & Block LLP, Respondent
Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Tata America International Corp. D/B/A TCS America
Robert N. Hochman — Sidley Austin, LLP, Petitioner
Robert N. Hochman — Sidley Austin, LLP, Petitioner