Thurayyah Z. Richardson v. The Procter and Gamble Company, et al.
DueProcess
Where a trial court resolving summary judgment denies due process
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Where a trial court deciding summary judgment resolves genuine issues of disputed material fact adversely to Plaintiff instead of ruling on the law, has the Plaintiff been denied the due process of law in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? 2. Where an appellate court upholds a grant of summary judgment, finding that the unverified, unsworn complaint is a judicial admission binding on the Plaintiff, which is opposite the law and the applicable binding precedent, has Plaintiff been denied the due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution by an abuse of discretion? 3. Where an appellate court decides a case partially upon a plainly incorrect assertion that an issue (that the contract was oral) was not raised until summary judgment, but the record is plain and incontrovertible that the issue was raised in discovery months earlier, did the plain error deny Plaintiff the due process of law in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by a clear error? 4. Where a Plaintiff consented to a specific use of her image on a product box for U.S. stores over a specific period of time, does the single publication rule apply to bar recovery for use of the image on the box for internet advertising in all countries for all time? ii II. LIST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS This action has no