No. 23-406
Taylor J. Matson v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: case-agent criminal-procedure evidence evidence-summary jury-inference jury-instructions lay-opinion lay-witness-testimony legal-interpretation plain-language-interpretation summary-of-evidence witness-testimony
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether case agents may offer lay opinions summarizing evidence, interpreting plain language, and drawing inferences from evidence that only a jury may draw for itself
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether case agents may offer lay opinions summarizing evidence, interpreting plain language, and drawing inferences from evidence that only a jury may draw for itself. (A 3-8 split.)
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2023)
2023-08-09
Application (23A110) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 14, 2023.
2023-08-02
Application (23A110) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2023 to October 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Taylor J. Matson
Thomas Arnold Antoine Beller Burns — Burns, P.A., Petitioner
Thomas Arnold Antoine Beller Burns — Burns, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent