No. 23-408

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Suzanne Ivie

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: affirmative-defense burden-of-proof civil-procedure claim evidentiary-standard final-pretrial-order judicial-process litigation-procedure pretrial-order rule-16
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a party may generally contest the opposing party's burden of proof on a claim or affirmative defense in a final pretrial order under Rule 16, or must specifically identify each disputed element

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In a final pretrial order under Rule 16, may a party generally contest whether the opposing party will satisfy its burden of proof on a claim or affirmative defense or must a party specifically identify each disputed element.

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne Ivie to respond filed.
2023-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2023)

Attorneys

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Thomas M. PetersonMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Thomas M. PetersonMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Suzanne Ivie
Robert Scott OswaldThe Employment Law Group, PC, Respondent
Robert Scott OswaldThe Employment Law Group, PC, Respondent