No. 23-408
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Suzanne Ivie
Tags: affirmative-defense burden-of-proof civil-procedure claim evidentiary-standard final-pretrial-order judicial-process litigation-procedure pretrial-order rule-16
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party may generally contest the opposing party's burden of proof on a claim or affirmative defense in a final pretrial order under Rule 16, or must specifically identify each disputed element
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED In a final pretrial order under Rule 16, may a party generally contest whether the opposing party will satisfy its burden of proof on a claim or affirmative defense or must a party specifically identify each disputed element.
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-03
Waiver of right of respondent Suzanne Ivie to respond filed.
2023-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 17, 2023)
Attorneys
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Thomas M. Peterson — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Thomas M. Peterson — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Suzanne Ivie
Robert Scott Oswald — The Employment Law Group, PC, Respondent
Robert Scott Oswald — The Employment Law Group, PC, Respondent