Whether the underlying rulings contradict the plain text of the applicable ERISA provisions in finding a breach of Petitioners' fiduciary duties and disavow Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in depriving the Petitioners of the statutory right to amend their affirmative defenses?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the underlying rulings contradict the plain text of the applicable ERISA provisions in finding a breach of Petitioners’ fiduciary duties and disavow Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in depriving the Petitioners of the statutory right to amend their affirmative defenses? u RELATED CASES Hugler v. Sherrod, No. 16 C 4825, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judgment entered March 17, 2017. (Denial of motion to amend pleadings). Walsh v. Sherrod, No. 16 C 4825, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judgment entered March 31, 2022. (Grant of summary judgment). Walsh v. Sherrod, No. 16 C 4825, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Judgment entered June 2, 2022. (Grant of injunctive relief). Su v. Johnson, Nos. 22-2204 & 22-2205, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Judgment entered May 10, 2023.