No. 23-427

Domino’s Pizza, LLC v. Edmond Carmona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: civil-procedure commerce-clause delivery-drivers federal-arbitration-act interstate-commerce local-delivery standing statutory-interpretation transportation-law workers
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA WageAndHour Jurisdiction ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-04-19 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether local delivery drivers are 'engaged in foreign or interstate commerce' under the Federal Arbitration Act

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether local delivery drivers—i.e., workers who make in-state deliveries of goods in response to instate orders, and play no role in transporting those goods across borders—are nevertheless “engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” for purposes of Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act? (i)

Docket Entries

2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2024-01-03
2023-12-20
2023-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2024.
2023-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2023 to January 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-07
Response Requested. (Due December 7, 2023)
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent Edmond Carmona, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Domino’s Pizza, LLC
Courtney Gilligan SaleskiDLA Piper LLP, Petitioner
Courtney Gilligan SaleskiDLA Piper LLP, Petitioner
Edmond Carmona, Abraham Mendoza, and Roger Nogueria, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Aashish Y. DesaiDesai Law Firm, P.C., Respondent
Aashish Y. DesaiDesai Law Firm, P.C., Respondent