When there is admitted by courts conflict between the federal courts and state courts on such all-important matters such as jurisdiction, which court is mandated to take preemptive action to enforce this Court's ruling?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When there is admitted by courts conflict between the federal courts and state courts on such allimportant matters such as jurisdiction per Petitioner’s 22A445, which court is mandated to take preemptive action to enforce this Court’s ruling in Yellow Freight © System, Incorporated v. Donnelly (1990) and ROBB v. CONNOLLY (1884) to close the loophole of conflicting oppositional jurisdiction, the federal court or the state court? Congress deprived state courts of the power they normally have — that is, the power to decide their own jurisdiction. £.g., American Fire & Cas. Co. v. Finn, 341 US. 6 (1951); Landry v. Cornell Constr. Co., 87 R.I. 4, 137 A.2d 412 (1957). Federal decisions usually speak of a duty of the court to raise the jurisdictional issue. E.g., Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583, 588 (1939); St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 287, n.10 (1938). 2. When there is proven First Breach, do the Federal Courts have to proactively consider as the number one priority over all others the First Breach because uncured First Breach makes Supersedeas and all other matters moot per PAUL E. MALONE, SR. & FAITH LANIER MALONE, Plaintiffs v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendants, Case No. 1:14-cv-193 (WLS) United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division. May 12, 2016. Is a supersedeas . | ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued unconstitutional when there is proven “cannot enforce contract until cure first breach”? 3. Nowhere in law is a lone judge able to act without appeal or accountability but in Georgia state courts there is ruling that there is no appeal or review for supersedeas bonds that has become de facto means for evictions during appeal process? Is it unconstitutional for there NOT to be an appeal/review mechanism within the Georgia Court system to review a sole judge’s order concerning supersedeas? Instant case a nullity no state jurisdiction order for an illegally inflated supersedeas bond that violates O.C.G.A. § 5-646(a) on a home that has almost 100% equity ($500,000) to debt to cover all potential costs of appeal is being misused as means to evict 100% legally right homeowner due to no appeal process. a e) Nothing in this Code section shall deprive the superior courts of their separate power to grant supersedeas under paragraph (1) of Code Section 15-6-9 (e) Nothing in this Code section shall deprive the superior courts of their separate power to grant supersedeas under paragraph (1) of Code Section 15-6-9 4. Considering recent unanimous ruling TYLER v. HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, ET AL. No. 22-166. Decided May 25, 2023 concerning overages of tax debt, is it unconstitutionally illegal per predatory lending laws and usuary interest banking laws for mortgage companies who were bailed out by taxpayers iii QUESTIONS PRESENTED — Continued to instead of work with homeowners to refinance chose to foreclose because incentivized and rewarded for : foreclosing on homeowners to acquire all the house’s appreciation and equity in excess of mortgage debt? 5. How are states to protect homeowners who are whistleblowers per the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act “Act” that overhauled the United States financial oversight regime to protect homeowners, etc.? Currently there is a serious conflict between state courts that unconstitutionally have no protection and the national organizations and states Attorneys General who do not help homeowners in deference to courts. There needs to be a mechanism to protect homeowner’s who show valid proof as whistleblowers while court cases are in process. Do federal agencies and Attorneys General join lawsuits are parties helping homeowners exposing largest mortgage scam in history as explained later.