No. 23-437
Anthony A. Anderson v. United States
Tags: constitutional-law court-martial criminal-prosecution due-process equal-protection liberty-interests property-interests sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the United States Constitution require that a general court-martial guilty verdict be unanimous?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the United States Constitution require that a general court-martial guilty verdict be unanimous?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-08
Reply of petitioner Anthony A. Anderson filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-27
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 27, 2023.
2023-11-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 27, 2023 to December 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2023)
2023-09-07
Application (23A219) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 30, 2023.
2023-09-05
Application (23A219) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 27, 2023 to October 30, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Anthony A. Anderson
Scott E. Gant — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Petitioner
Scott E. Gant — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent