No. 23-441
Patrick Fehlman v. James Mankowski
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment-law first-amendment free-speech government-retaliation public-employee public-employment retaliation
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the government free to continue to retaliate against a former public employee for speech made during the employee's employment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Is the government free to continue to retaliate against a former public employee for speech made during the employee’s employment? i
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-11
Reply of petitioner Patrick Fehlman filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-27
Brief of respondent James Mankowski in opposition filed.
2023-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2023)
Attorneys
James Mankowski
Michael James Roman — Klinner Kramer Shull LLP, Respondent
Michael James Roman — Klinner Kramer Shull LLP, Respondent
Elizabeth Diane Reeths — Klinner Kramer Shull LLP, Respondent
Elizabeth Diane Reeths — Klinner Kramer Shull LLP, Respondent
Patrick Fehlman
Paul Allan Kinne — Gingras, Thomsen and Wachs, LLP, Petitioner
Paul Allan Kinne — Gingras, Thomsen and Wachs, LLP, Petitioner