Whether a court can condition a fit parent's ability to have any contact with his child on unwanted medical treatment without finding that the treatment is medically necessary to serve a compelling state interest

QUESTION PRESENTED A Tennessee family court barred Petitioner from having any contact with his 17-year-old son until Petitioner completes invasive, unwanted mental health therapy, despite finding that Petitioner is a loving, fit parent and that severing the father-son relationship would not improve—and indeed may harm—the son’s relationship with his mother. The question presented is: Whether a court, consistent with the Due Process Clause, can condition a fit parent’s ability to have any contact with his child on unwanted medical treatment without finding that the treatment is medically necessary to serve a compelling state interest.