No. 23-455
United States v. Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-challenge domestic-violence due-process firearms firearms-possession protective-order second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-07-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) violates the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by persons subject to domesticviolence protective orders, violates the Second Amendment on its face. (I)
Docket Entries
2024-08-05
Judgment Issued.
2024-07-02
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2024-07-02
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-30
Brief of respondent Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan in opposition filed.
2023-11-30
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan.
2023-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Litsson Antonio Perez-Gallan
Shane O'Neal — O'Neal Law, Respondent
Shane O'Neal — O'Neal Law, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Petitioner
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Petitioner