No. 23-460

C.K. Sales Co., LLC, et al. v. Margarito V. Canales, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: and distribute baked goods within defined intrast sell civil-procedure contract-employment contract-exemption employment-contracts employment-law exemption-clause federal-arbitration-act interstate-commerce intrastate-commerce statutory-interpretation transportation-worker transportation-workers
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2024-04-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Federal Arbitration Act's exemption for 'contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, and any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce' applies to a class of workers who do not work in the transportation industry, but instead market, sell, and distribute baked goods within defined intrastate territories

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not “apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, and any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” 9 U.S.C. §1. This Court has afforded § 1 a “narrow construction” and held that its residual clause (“any other class of workers’) applies only to “contracts of employment of transportation workers.” Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 115-19 (2001). This Court has further clarified that “transportation workers” include only those classes of workers who “play a direct and ‘necessary role in the free flow of goods’ across borders.” Sw. Airlines Co. v. Saxon, 596 U.S. 450, 458 (2022) (quoting Circuit City, 532 U.S. at 121). The question presented is whether § 1 applies to a class of workers who do not work in the transportation industry, but instead market, sell, and distribute baked goods within defined intrastate territories.

Docket Entries

2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2023-12-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-29
Letter dated November 27, 2023 from counsel for respondents received.
2023-10-30
2023-08-03
Application (23A92) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until October 30, 2023.
2023-07-27
Application (23A92) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 31, 2023 to October 30, 2023, submitted to Justice Jackson.

Attorneys

C.K. Sales Co. LLC, et al.
Traci L. LovittJones Day, Petitioner
Traci L. LovittJones Day, Petitioner
Margarito V. Canales, et al.
Benjamin Caldwell RudolfMurphy and Rudolf, LLP, Respondent
Benjamin Caldwell RudolfMurphy and Rudolf, LLP, Respondent