No. 23-462
Glen Wilkofsky v. American Federation of Musicians, Local 45, et al.
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-claim fourteenth-amendment governmental-purpose judicial-deference legislative-determination public-employer public-entity state-action statutory-designation
Key Terms:
LaborRelations
LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When applying the Fourteenth Amendment's requirement of 'state action' as a predicate for constitutional claims, should federal courts defer to a state's legislative choice to deem an entity 'public' for certain governmental purposes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. When applying the Fourteenth Amendment’s requirement of “state action” as a predicate for constitutional claims, should federal courts defer to a state’s legislative choice to deem an entity “public” for certain governmental purposes? (i)
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-14
Reply of petitioner Glen Wilkofsky filed.
2023-12-01
Brief of respondent Allentown Symphony Association, Inc. in opposition filed.
2023-11-29
Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Fair Treatment filed.
2023-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent American Federation of Musicians, Local 45 to respond filed.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 1, 2023)
Attorneys
Allentown Symphony Association, Inc.
Rebecca Jo Price — Norris McLaughlin, P.A, Respondent
American Federation of Musicians, Local 45
Quintes D. Taglioli — Markowitz & Richman, Respondent
Americans for Fair Treatment
Glen Wilkofsky
Nathan John McGrath — The Fairness Center, Petitioner