No. 23-472

Dora L. Bonner v. Triple S Management Corporation, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: admissibility-of-evidence affidavit-evidence circuit-court-conflict circuit-court-conflicts civil-procedure discovery discovery-dispute procedural-fairness rico-violations summary-judgment weighing-of-evidence
Key Terms:
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the First Circuit Court of Appeals err in granting summary judgment to Triple-S Management Corporation and Triple-S Vida based solely on a merits defense claim?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Introduction The Court of Appeals upheld grant of summary judgment for Respondents on Plaintiff’s claims for RICO violations and state law claims of Breach of Contract, Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty. The court erred in upholding the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Respondents merits defense based on affidavits only. The appeals court also erred in upholding the district court’s denial of Motion to Compel answers to discovery and Motions for additional time for discovery from both Plaintiff and Respondents. Under U.S. Supreme Court’s authority, summary judgment does not permit weighing of evidence and Plaintiff must have an adequate time for discovery. I. Did the First Circuit Court of Appeals error in granting summary judgment to both Triple-S Management Corporation and Triple-S Vida based solely on a single merits defense claim? II. Did the First Circuit Court of Appeals error by deciding on the admissibility of nonmovants’ evidence before determining if there was a genuine issue of material fact, and subsequently, weighing the evidence thus causing a conflict in the Circuit Courts? III. Did the Circuit Court of Appeals error in failing to consider whether Bonner had enough time to complete discovery before it upheld the District Court’s grant of summary judgment, despite incomplete discovery and requests from all parties to extend the discovery period evidencing a split between the circuit courts. ii STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES Dora L. Bonner v. Triples S Management Corporation, Triple-S Vida, No. 19-CV-01128 (GAG-BJM), U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Judgment entered December 17, 2021. Dora L. Bonner v. Triple S Management Corporation, Triple-S Vida, Inc., No. 22-1066, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Judgment entered May 19, 2023. Dora L. Bonner v. Triple S Management Corporation, Triple-S Vida Inc., No. 22-1006. U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Rehearing denied, Judgment entered, June 23, 2023.

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-03
Brief of respondents Triple-S Management Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 3, 2024.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2023 to January 3, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-01
2023-09-07
Application (23A223) granted by Justice Jackson extending the time to file until November 1, 2023.
2023-08-30
Application (23A223) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 21, 2023 to November 1, 2023, submitted to Justice Jackson.

Attorneys

Dora Bonner
Dora Lee BonnerDora L. Bonner, PLLC d/b/a Law Off Dora L. Bonner, Petitioner
Dora Lee BonnerDora L. Bonner, PLLC d/b/a Law Off Dora L. Bonner, Petitioner
Triple-S Vida, Inc. and Triple-S Management Corporation
Maria D. Trelles-HernandezPietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLC, Respondent
Maria D. Trelles-HernandezPietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez LLC, Respondent