Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Kentucky treatment ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors should be subject to heightened scrutiny under the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED In 2023, the Kentucky Legislature enacted a blanket ban on the use of certain medical treatments for transgender minors. The ban applies when the treatments are used “for the purpose of attempting to alter the appearance of, or to validate a minor’s perception of, the minor’s sex, if that appearance or perception is inconsistent with the minor’s sex.” Ky. Rev. Stat. § 311.872(2) (the “Treatment Ban”). A federal district court preliminarily enjoined the Treatment Ban, but the Sixth Circuit reversed the injunction, upholding the Treatment Ban under rational basis review. The questions presented are: 1. Whether, under the Due Process Clause, the Treatment Ban should be subjected to heightened scrutiny because it burdens parents’ right to direct the medical treatment of their children. 2. Whether, under the Equal Protection Clause, the Treatment Ban should be subjected to heightened scrutiny because it classifies on the basis of sex and transgender status. 3. Whether Petitioners are likely to show that the Treatment Ban does not satisfy heightened scrutiny.
2025-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2024-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-06-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-20
Reply of petitioners Jane Doe 1, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-02-05
Brief of respondent Kentucky in opposition filed.
2023-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 5, 2024.
2023-12-14
Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed under Rule 46 only as to petitioners John Doe 3, Jane Doe 3, and Jane Minor Doe 3.
2023-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 10, 2024 to February 5, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-11
Stipulation to dismiss the petition under Rule 46.1 as to petitioners John Doe 3, Jane Doe 3, and Jane Minor Doe 3 only filed.
2023-12-11
Brief amici curiae of American Academy of Pediatrics and Additional National and State Medical and Mental Health Organizations filed.
2023-12-11
Brief amicus curiae of TransParent filed.
2023-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2024.
2023-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 11, 2023 to January 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 11, 2023)