Question Presented

Question Presented Appeal/Trial Courts should not allow blatant perjury and/or false statements to be considered just. Also, Appeal Court will not reopen this case unless, the Supreme Ct make opinion for the compensation. Therefore, the Supreme Ct should reopen and redo the trial for this case. Moreover, the 4th District of 2nd Division of Riverside Ca made PFS confused if there had all evidences of exhibition, including the DFIILAW, Larry Valdez, who used the new false document which was the falsely signed Deposition, which looked as if PfKevin’s signature was taken and attached on the new created Depo Paper, along with all medical reports and the stolen the skit mark picture of the Ex30-1 /1-1. 2. The Arbitration, (ATM 1), proved that DF, Vel, et. Al was 100% liable and had to pay for the damage done to PF’s car so the trial did not need the jury's verdict to find who was negligent. Nevertheless, both PF & DF Insurances schemed all facts and truths to blame the accident on PF, Kevin, instead of the negligent, DF, Vel, differentiating from the Arbitration result. Even though the damage included not only property damage, such as the car, but also human injury. Therefore, as the Arbitration result, both insurance companies, Geico and Infinity, should pay the compensation to the PF, minor L.J’s eye injuries including muscles, joints, etc. CTHJ&BOTH INSURANCES MADE THAT NO MATTER HOW SERIOUS INJURED, THE NEGLIGENT IS LIABLE TO ALL RESPONSIBILITIES. THEN BOTH INSURANCES AND DF, VEL MADE FALSIFIED TO THE NEGLIGENT DIFFERENTLY FROM THE ARBITRATION AND THEN REMOVED THE ARBITRATION IN THE COURT TO NOT SHOW THE ARBITRATION TO THE JURIES. ALL THING ARE SCHEMED BY THE BAD FAITH WITH THE COURT UNITY. 17 7 3. And/or: Medical expertise witness. Do pfs need to hire doctors with connecting lawyers, even though the fact of injury is certainly from this car accident? Are medical records not equal to | Witness of Doctors and are the physical injuries that only occurred after the car accident and not before | still not enough proof? Please accept the fact of the health changes that occurred to PFS, from this car accident and pay for compensation. The compensation must consider the fact of medical report after the | car accident; injuries, including the minors’ severe eye vision loss to the point that he must wear glasses forever, with serious astigmatism with serious acute myopia, about a month after the car accident. At this point, the trauma leaves a big difference in eye vision at a sudden, which is in contrast to general loss from growth, and is like dilation. It is attached to medical doctor support. L.J cannot do serious physical exercises like football with serious running like a marathon which requires a doctor note, and diagnosed an x-shape of his hip and knee bones. The PF, minor, L.J, has not only suffered from his large and acute eyes’ vision loss, but will also suffer from a gradual continuous loss as LLU, eye doctor, Ishmael, said verbally. 4. ‘Bad faith’ is just too cruel, especially for PFminor, LJ, with false statements, a false document with previously unknown materials, and false testimonies from the DF, Vel et. Al and both PFIGLAW, Sandra Hurn and DFIILAW, Larry Valdez, and DFIILAW, Maxine Harvey along with Anthony Case to win and to avoid paying compensation for the injuries that pf Kevin and pfm,L sustained. 3 Il.