No. 23-5030
Nygel Dejon Freeman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-provisions court-of-appeals criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-evidence reasonable-doubt rule-29 statutory-provisions sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals erred in denying Mr. Freeman's Rule 29 motion due to insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LI, Whether the Distict Court and Cout of Appeals erred ia denying Me Freeman 3 hule 29 motion because the Governments evidence Wad jngubbiecent to prove Mr Freemans quilt beyond a reasonable dub: . i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2023)
2023-04-12
Application (22A892) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 5, 2023.
2023-03-28
Application (22A892) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 6, 2023 to June 5, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent