No. 23-5031
Marc Anthony Hill v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: advance-knowledge apprendi-precedent circuit-court-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process essential-elements fifth-amendment four-corner-rule jury-findings sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Apprendi v. New Jersey still good law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Is Apprendi v. New Jersey still good law? If Yes.ar&stthe Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and other circuits applying Apprendi incorrectly which violates the "four corner" rule? Is Rosemond still good law? If yes... Does the Jury have to find the essential element "Advance Knowledge" as required under Rosemond? ;
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-20
Supplemental brief of petitioner Marc Anthony Hill filed. (Distributed)
2023-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Marc Anthony Hill
Marc Anthony Hill — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent