No. 23-5043
Coby Quinton Ceaser v. Tim Hooper, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-suppression ineffective-assistance jackson-standard jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-present-defense right-to-testify trial-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the Jackson standard be satisfied when relevant, material, and appreciable evidence is impermissibly kept from the jury?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can the Jackson standard be satisfied when relevant, material, and appreciable evidence is impermissibly kept from the jury? 2. Was Ceaser’s trial rendered fundamentally unfair as a result of the prosecution’s egregious and insistent misconduct. 3. Waz Ceaser deprived of his right to testify in his own defense? 4. Was Ceaser denied the benefit of counsel at a critical stage? 3. . Was Ceaser denied his right to present a complete defense? 6. Did Ceaser’s appellate counsel render ineffective assistance on appeal? li
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Hooper, Warden to respond filed.
2023-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Coby Q. Ceaser
Coby Quinton Ceaser — Petitioner
Tim Hooper, Warden
David S. Pipes — Calcasieu Parish District Attorney's Office, Respondent