No. 23-505
Garrett A. Arrowood v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response Waived
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability confrontation-clause crawford-violation criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-law habeas-corpus hearsay-evidence
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THE RECORD SUPPORTS THE COURT'S CONCLUSION THAT THE STATE COURT HEARING REGARDING THE INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY (CRAWFORD VIOLATION) DID NOT VIOLATE ANY FEDERAL LAWS.
II. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS EMPLOYS A PROCESS FOR THE ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF CERTIFICATES OF APPEALABILITY (COA) THAT VIOLATES FUNDAMENTAL DUE PROCESS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-record-supports-the-court's-conclusion-that-the-state-court-hearing-regarding-the-inadmissible-hearsay-(crawford-violation)-did-not-violate-any-federal-laws
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-21
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections to respond filed.
2023-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2023)
Attorneys
Garrett Arrowood
David Walter Collins — David W. Collins, Petitioner
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Trisha Meggs Pate — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent