Did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erroneously find that the courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction and that the petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is moot?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERROUNEOUSLY FIND : THAT THE COURTS LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND THAT YOUR PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS MOOT? DOES THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT 2 CONFLICT WITH THIS COURTS PRECENDENTS WILKINS v. UNITED STATES, . 441 U.S. 468, 99 S. Ct. 1829 (1979) CONCERNING YOUR PETITIONER'S DILEMMA ADVANCED IN HIS MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL? (i) .