No. 23-5078

Kendrick Ramon Page v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure fourth-amendment minimization minimization-requirement motion-to-suppress necessity probable-cause theory-of-defense-instruction wiretap wiretap-evidence
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 8th Circuit erred in affirming the denial of wiretap evidence and the refusal to provide a theory of defense instruction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the 8" Circuit erred by affirming the district court’s denial of Page’s MTS wiretap evidence because the necessary probable cause under 18 USC Section 2518(3)(a) and (b) was lacking the minimization requirement under 18 USC Section 2518(5) was not met, and the necessity requirements of 18 USC Section 2518(3)(c) were not complied with. 2. Whether the 8" Circuit erred by affirming the trial court’s refusal to provide Page with a theory of defense instruction because its decision conflicts with decisions by the Supreme Court and other United States Courts of Appeals who have addressed the issue of when a theory of defense instruction is required.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-06

Attorneys

Kendrick Ramon Page
Joseph G. BertogliBertogli Law, Petitioner
Joseph G. BertogliBertogli Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent