I. Whether The Seventh Circuit Denial of Certiorari of Appellate, ity And Subsequent Rehearing To Remand The Enormous Denial of Habeas Relief had Post-Judgment Probes By The District Court Was Denial of Adequate Access To The Court AND Procedural Due Process Bews Such A Departure From The Accepted And Usual Course of Judicial Habeas Proceedings As To Call For An Exercise of This Court's Super Jurisdiction Powers.

II. Whether The District Court Abused Its Discretion By Denying Petitioner Adequate Access To Court Procedural Due Process And Expression Of Time And a on Apparent net of Counsel Prior To Subsequently Denying Habeas Relief And Compounding The Manifest Error Per Forcing Petitioner To Proceed Pro Se Despite Petitioner's Clearly Established Severe Mental And Medical Disabilities Also Stroke of Education And Subsequently Refusing To Allow Pro Se Filings Being Such a Departure From Accepted And Usual Course of Judicial Habeas Proceedings As To Call For Exercise of This Court's Supervisory Powers.

III. Whether The Substantial Admission At Trial of An Overwhelming Volume of Hearsay Statements The Victim Allegedly Made Pursuant To The Unconstitutional Sec Section of US Code of Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure CCP ELMS SINS-10.20 Coat toF)) Tah Eur deve Tr Unviolent OF The Confrontation Clause Making A Categorical

IV. Ruling Excluding Statement 5 Involving The Governed From The Structures Of The Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause Rews An Impermissible Federal Question not Satisfied By This Court Both Shall Be As being Taportuwnt To The Purview of This Essence.

Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' denial of habeas relief had post-judgment procedural defects that denied adequate access to the courts and procedural due process