No. 23-5104
Annelies Aiking-Taylor v. Oliver Serang
IFP
Tags: attorney-fees civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-review legal-judgment prevailing-party supremacy-clause takings
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Montana Supreme Court violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause by disregarding the US Supreme Court's definition of 'prevailing party'?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Montana Supreme Court violate the Constitution's Supremacy Clause by disregarding the _ definition of “prevailing party” as decided by the US Supreme Court? ‘ Tam the only party with an enforceable judgment ($55), which alters the legal relationship between the parties, but J am nonetheless declared the losing party liable for the other party’s attorney fees of $30,000. This amount will destroy my life.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2023)
Attorneys
Annelies Aiking-Taylor
Annelies Aiking-Taylor — Petitioner