No. 23-5124

Quincetta Yvonne Cargill, aka Queen, aka Tonya, aka Angela Scott, aka Antela Scott, aka QuincetTucker, aka Quincetta Tucker v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-counsel appellate-procedure civil-rights direct-appeal due-process eleventh-circuit ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-proceedings petition-for-rehearing right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the exclusion of the appellant's opinions, requests for inclusion of psychiatrist's testimony, and other information as to the preserved issues' relevance by the appellate counsel constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : __ Supreme Court Bule 14> Content ofa Petition fora ___ _ ___@) Questions_preseated for review in Where the acted prose attrial _presecuinug Seuernl viable issues fac appcal,claes the _ exclusion of the eppcilandts opimions, cegucsts i.e _ _ melusionol psychiatasts testimony, antol_in form ation = _ _ as tothe preserved issues felevamce._by the appellate —_ _ teounsel_comstitute imefRetiue assistanceof counsel 2 1 Daes.the cle the rightte ise __temtrolor provide imputocdicectives tothe. icce+ Appeal 2 ta) Where the deRudent-appcllaut fled astimely petition foc Be-Heariaes of Direct Rapealas-uies bisea!ypan) ieFicetiits £§@£$ should proofol imebketive mssistamee te: appellate counsel dlid aiot conse Amy oF the resues ___ alleged. int the. prro-se Appellant beiek, 2 __ th) Shoulel wot the Appellate Couct have _explaimed te reason foc clewielob the. Petition for Be: henriadg 2 _ a ce a ng Supreme Court Bule_i4Contentofa Petition fora _— Wit Cortionmr bh list of all_pacties tothe protecddinsg ial the court ———whese_judgmentis sought to be resuieu ded a United States Couctol Appeals forthe Eleventh Ciceuit kk Unviked States Distoet Court forthe Eleventh Cicewif tis_nve corporate oliselosuce statement cepuined. —_tlin_p list ofall procecabinugs in stocte. esol Lea ecedeeie| _amc_appellate coucts that Acc_clicectly cclated +o the crse___— iw this Courts a Umite_ct States of America _v. Quiveetta Yo Cargill) TU mittea Stakes Distoad Court Bethe UerthewDisbick of Alabama (Southern Division) _4._Umitteel States of America v Quinectta UY. Ceres ){ — —_ ited States Court of Appeals fic the eleveith Giceust a” 2-70) 1,03 27 Bat 1 € 2 8. Supreme Couct of the United states _ Dochet Mo. Se Yd, United States of Ara ec.ca_v.Quincette Y. Carsill tect Stodes Court of Apaenls forthe Elewew®, Cireuik 24-1358 G6 _Petitions Foc Rebencinig ( Defeadenst peAi-tiones _ ts United States Distoct Couct forthe vocthew Distacto F Alabama __— _(seuthem Division) Petition for Release Pealina Appeal (De feaselemet. _ petitiowe-) _ Supreme Court Bule.14Comteat of a Petition fora writ of Cectiorari _ table of Comtets _Lishefeil Parties Table. of Cittedt Autocity — dt _ Comuse Statementofthe Basis — of Jurisdittow I . Coustitutiowval P-ou'sions 4 —__Direed-ud Comise Pirsunnense tg 1b Opinions, orders, Finsdinia. of fed, _ emvd_conwclusions' of law 10, _ _ of fact end Conclusions of law a Other material Essential to Understamd attached Documents + (inorder astisted below) a) Pppellawts Bric due j9-5-goaa a) Petitioners Pequest foc Extension of Time nile ND ACTION NOTELE _0 Petition fac Ae: Hearing. <Decatied — prod Hybrid Couvsel Tusulbics I: es wonctzow wottce" metion-te Submit Amended Complaimt® _f.Origimal OPimion APRcm Conviction G) OTHER MOTICES ___-___ Ha $174 UNSWOAN DECLABATLON under povalty of perjucy ee Supreme Court Bule 14+ Convtertal A Petition for A | _ Table of Citeat Authorities : 1m Faae_5, 2002 Petition for Rehearing 18 DENIED Qupreme. Court Bule i4Conmtevt ofa Petition for a bof Cechiorne: a aes _o_Citetions of the Official avd Unofficial Reports of the Opinions in the Case _ _ ee an Facetta v Califecmin 422 US, 0b (1975) bi _Umited States v. Garey , 54) F. Bd 1253, 126° CU Cir, 2008) __ a United States v Hakim, 30 £44 1310, 1818 (ii Cur 2022) jig dy Ueto States Vv. Moc), 972 F.3d 742, 958 (il Cir, 2015) ey) Uitert States v. Descent, 298 Fad 703,706 Ci eic ao0a) —_#i Umited States v. Dawis #54 F.3d 1276, 1293 (11 Cir, 2017) 49 United States v. Bastom, £18 Fi3d_b5l, 663 UI Gir, aole) —_hy Uwited States ¥. Aamirez-Flores, 43, F.3d 8le,¢21 (11 Cic. aojf) | i Unsited states. 2. Vanidecgcift, 254 F.3d 1303, 1307 (il Gir. 2014) jn ite states y zitrom, Blo F.3d 1853, 1a! (il Cic. dow) Hy _Umited states v. Ballwin) 174 F.3d 71,797 Ci Cir, 2014) oe I 1) FAAP 35, TOP 2 ee eee Supreme Court Bule_14Content ofa Petition fora ___, rit of Cectionari. _1¢)_A_Comeise Statement of the basis for_juciselietions ta) _— ths courte

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Quincetta Cargill
Quincetta Y. Cargill — Petitioner
Quincetta Y. Cargill — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent