No. 23-5125

Justin Lewis v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance jurisdiction sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the government from prosecuting a defendant for the same offense after a court has previously denied the defendant's motion to dismiss on Double Jeopardy grounds

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : | a I, fa beds I} able : z wif Ay, Lot, vil , Mit / Le i Tf ines lapel Land fol ay saioapic ed gee kek Con : : Hh. Cok }” sls ial cle wih facta bles dts bela cashes iil pa? Be pa la Ae pan oda Mh decid ec Mf ig ai lanl dike, iy LA pin cate yale Da Le bn pupil tas th punt (ourf, ) (altings. wpa, aod dbsoleh a Din cnititull, wa tlehbs Y ae i TE Ae Cohan ba Lanka wilt, hay at bi all coh hd hfe igh ah Ad Litis Chaka 3, shal dessin Hib aa fail gla td Bie mg be slob tak iat ail sala his clin fr Senmit Mfivmine ae Double Tepacly pore: peed Mel QQ10564) “ ; Gono Coat appiet unused epressifin as. « leruage te peat » Dekadant{ Apps lat Eom appapidely iliog metioosfal-a Couit Koowse bas absolatt mecif but dengs his sight te Setf-rgescafition te prevast Fhe Filing schich may quant him instat scishA dh Cova Tele persuiden Defadett Bom cepuscig inl by shy duibache beds such as — athena ilegal_ Foudh Ameer ssacch has aced, Ha pull. cehadec, iE apoiated, will ultize the __ -extlusionacy 1 h te Suppress the fruits of the tainted seacch 7 ( Theigh fhe Public Defeadec. never inkends : Gil the motion) — doef aaah te beep th jue wsihag® Hts th shakin bs Be S Maat nck fh Cot & ules cael psu #18 SSIS Ty tht see notoa Bas Po cathy te Dfeetcih« Dalle Tel cin x caadltind — fe be for_his celeane aod. the , Plait i i deel cis hat he Dad Tegpdy ios“ fale s Can Hh littl chia Fea Double Tsprly be asp adit bis nohon ee lane, b gine the —_ televineof Tusisdicfion on he seecod ‘ue? -vatbely denied the Defedaatemstion witha casens Hs. s0, the Diferdaat innediately gpsled thet —— dacision, Dp sach sf the Dcbadeats appl, the Dit Coat shatyjaly dais sishthe lsied the ~appil Lo Fas. Papas (evn Hessh deca indiest) bees the Pde appeal ssas nob taken in Good Faith <The qhn prenael is 2 pacts Con a Cou vecbaly’ dey a. achin fo dion on a Chali Da, Ty Bc’ al 2 Sl hf Det Tia pi bs ctl tena nc ile a Gscd Fill agua, hen a ly Hh siunat hte it bing use os.« teal —_ Maneuver £ neveat a Dibodastfan seek ag rebict fom a highec court 4 tA LE 1 Defeadant is apolling « udymuat tim a Distict Couto a Creuit Couit (docked os ~ eit 4 the Dihict Coat) and Be atic of peal bigs adic He Deda al 4 apel tes Cinuit Cont, Con 1 Dihit Couat diva Ht spel fom Be Cit Cou ad aif ib i Cit outs a dee te prt« Diodet fam sachig «higher Coat? be Aud ia julyert fon an appl the Elecath Cat tht on appeal foo tba of cathely poi Fal pei 4 IBUSCS YS iba bron th Cat bea hold gh On ancther Tatele aia appl tion. denial of mation th diaiss oo Double Tepacly gue, he Cah Cot ed thy la uid hae 4° ol t Dini nh <P ily —ppelable desn Cstadyaly city. te vison of FEB Mnclnesh Duele Tapeh Che.)o The He “the lt ie) aad pd a od BO HCl ae dtl Tsp ee ele oe il ph Bd Lath prt cy the Cost at seers hte habla jt onal ikaeateg spoT Plc essa at devel 2 HB ioc chia nb baad — en infloatry covou (Soe Sholboa, B56 Ed at 1260), Bat the Coca. Cou sabaily, —— alata able tbo epi prepa that nape tl aod sitee lack of Tei he iisdctioe hes already bow — Appespectly sthbliched . 8 —b. Doss_it constitute a Fifth, Eighth, aodor Foucteath hnealcat volition, te Kesp « Dsfeadeat— _conbined toon iasttaten he a. yolong zeiod_ot Fine withost ceassn upble await 4_tompetancy Dbl se ine spinal tal capncy eshte Tain be allyl le ft these hal bi hid ican abil diet deat? BTa pla odes Heilgel} 27035, Googe Wats, auth the ssidene, Buk Lbs) Ss tol te rah o debelt julyoet on the Conditionally of both indictreds. 1. Loseli Tol tari and can wisdac per He ile Fan Taclges signath FA Alm acl hepsi De? —_—_ wt iy ted sii ile spoil pia se Sor sthich ss nce chasyad DE ilo Pin Lacey ol Tel Ta pid fad (thy Dl) sts That both properties tefl in th Nuthin Didi of Fei lath pps el the Mel ite) ID Teo fl byan (ATCC sod Fl. Cit ME) esrb bai of ai sg othe cept gesp eutinmat” agers y-itaolved with he miscendect, scp, c_prosceubion an atteypt Alc thiden f e fle itl nays op pala ain pend “beside & he Blane [Blob 1 by he gue (EC Da, 3,353, 37 38,39, 46,4,

Docket Entries

2024-01-16
Application (23A643) denied by Justice Thomas.
2023-10-25
Application (23A643) to file petition for rehearing in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Justin Lewis
Justin Lewis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent