Whether the lower state court's deliberate transgression of jurisdictional barriers imposed by the U.S. Constitution must be addressed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 4.) Whether this Honorable United States Supreme Court, pursuant /irticle HI, once raised, is duty-bound to address the lower state court's deliberate transgression of jurisdictional barriers imposed by the Constitution of the United States pursuant the 14" Amendment? 2.) “Must” the issue cf “jurisdiction be investigated and resolved once raised by one of the petitioning partyfies) to the litigation? 3.) Whether, when jurisdiction to adjudicate is wanting in the lower state court forum due tc the black-letter of the Constitution of the United States, state law, can the lower State Court forum legally transfer Jurisdiction tc this Hencrable United States Supreme Court, for a merit determination of the underlying claims or must jurisdiction be satisfied first? 4.) Whether the lower transferring State Court, while lacking jurisdiction tc adjudicate, (due to the challenged judgment being the by-product of federally-preempted state law(s)), evade satisfying itself on the issue cf Federal-Preemption of State law before attempted to reach any other judgment? 5.) Does Jurisdiction of the lower State Court becomes tainted by operaticn cf Constitutional Amendments which forbade all State Legislatures from enacting certain types of laws? {i.e. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of the Citizens of the United States within their jurisdictions) When State Legislators openly declared: ? &.} Whether an enforceable judgment can constitutionally arise out of application of Federally: Preempted State Laws, being used to deprive a person, recognized as enjoying substantive constitutional protections from the existence and aperation of federally-preempted state laws? ?. Can the State District Court and Court af Appeals constitutionally invoke a State procedural Bar as the reason for declining to consider the Federal Preemption question in light of Ward v. Love County, 253 U.S. 17, 22; Staub v. Baxley, 355 U.S, 213, 318-320)? 8. Does the Question of Federal-Preemption ge to the power of State Court over the subject matter of the controversy? 9, Can the question of jurisdictian be waived? 10. Can the question of jurisdiction be raised at any time, before any court in light of Seaboard Air Line Co, ¥. Daniel, 333 U.S. 118, 122-1237 1L Does a claim of Federal Preemption cf State Constitutional and State Statutory provisions Properly raise a pure Federal Question of Law? 12. When pure Federal Questions of Law are properly presented in plain view of the court below, are such State Courts at liberty to disregard such a question? 13. Are State Courts allowed, under the existing decisions of the United States Supreme Court, tc reject claims of Federal Preemption of State Laws which were expressly prohibited to all States to enact by the Constitution of the United States? (i.e. laws purposely designed to discriminate on the basis of race, color and/or previous condition af servitude) ii i — i ‘ i4, Are Constitutional Articles and State Statutory Laws which are opanly declared to and designed to discriminate against the negro on the basis of race, color and previous condition of Servitude, Federally Preempted from inception and void ab initio? 15. Because the 13", 14” and 15" Amendments of the United States Constitution and 18 U.S.C § 242 prohibited discrimination or denial of rights, privileges, immunities on the basis of race color ur previous condition of servitude, are State Actors obliged to give force to the federal provisions of law which allowed re-enslavement in violation of the United States Constitution? 16. Whether the Delegates of the Louisiana Constitutional Convent cf 1898 launched a direct attack against the Supremacy of the United State's Constitution, in its ability to prohibit the enactment of State Laws which discriminate on the basis of race, color or previous condition of : servitude? 17. Whether the Supremacy of the United States Constitution and the Federal La